AI is no longer a novelty in the marketing tech stack—it’s a strategic differentiator. From personalization and predictive analytics to content generation and customer segmentation, AI is reshaping how modern marketing functions.
Yet as marketing teams explore AI, many leaders fall into a common trap: assuming native tools like Salesforce Einstein or Adobe Sensei are sufficient for all AI use cases. They’re not.
This post offers a practical framework to help Enterprise Architects and Marketing Leaders evaluate when to use native AI capabilities of their mar-tech stack tools (CDP, Marketing Automation, Recommendation Engine etc.) and when to invest in custom models using platforms like Hugging Face.
Native AI vs. Hugging Face: Conceptual Comparison
When using native AI models within platforms like Salesforce Einstein GPT or Adobe Sensei (or for that matter other tools like CDP, CMS etc.), you don’t need to build or deploy your own machine learning models. These tools are plug-and-play, enabling you to implement common use cases such as:
- Optimize send times (e.g., Einstein, Sensei Journey AI)
- Select personalized content from a predefined asset library
- Score leads and predict engagement
- Analyze subject lines and campaign performance
- Segment audiences based on engagement signals
For example, a Salesforce Marketing Cloud user can apply Einstein Engagement Scoring to rank leads by their likelihood to interact. Similarly, Adobe Journey Optimizer users can leverage Sensei-powered personalization based on behavioral trends.
In contrast, Hugging Face provides the flexibility to train, fine-tune, and deploy your own models—making it ideal for specialized, brand-specific, or cross-platform use cases, such as:
- Generating copy in your brand voice or technical tone
- Performing sentiment and intent analysis across support, sales, and social channels
- Clustering users or products using custom embeddings
- Predicting behavior using inputs from CRM, billing, support, and product analytics
- Enabling multimodal use cases (e.g., image + text recommendations)
An Enterprise Architecture Perspective – Which Approach Should You Choose And When?
To make a well-informed decision, Mar-tech Enterprise Architects should break down the Marketing AI stack into five discrete architectural building blocks and compare how native tools and Hugging Face differ in terms of inputs required and functionality offered:
Architecture Building Block | Native AI Tools (Einstein, Sensei) | Custom AI (Hugging Face) |
Multi-source Data Collection and Storage | Minimal setup; uses CRM and marketing cloud data already integrated. Abstracted within vendor platforms (e.g., Salesforce CDP, Adobe Experience Platform) | Requires ETL/ELT pipelines from CRM, CMS, support, analytics, product usage, and APIs. Requires a lakehouse (e.g., Snowflake, Databricks) to manage raw and processed data |
Model Selection & Tuning Specifications | Prebuilt models only; no fine-tuning available | Select and Fine-tune models (e.g., GPT, BERT) on your domain-specific data and language. Decide between various fine-tuning methods (full, LORA, etc.) |
Model Training | None | Full control over training schedules, infrastructure (GPU sizing) |
Model Evaluation | Limited; model logic and metrics are opaque | Full control over evaluation, tuning, and retraining |
Model Deployment | Instantly embedded in native tools | Requires MLOps pipeline (e.g., containerized APIs), but supports any integration scenario |
Of these blocks, the foundational components (data collection, storage) are required to be implemented regardless of whether you use Einstein GPT or custom models. In most organizations, Marketing is not the only consumer of AI data and it is likely that these components will be built and controlled outside of the Marketing team remit.
The real divergence begins in the model lifecycle components (model selection, training, evaluation, and deployment) and this is where the bulk of architecture due diligence needs to be focused.
If your use cases align well with the native toolset, you may not need to build model lifecycle components, but you would still need to build the foundational components. However, in most enterprise environments, the complexity of marketing use cases quickly exceeds what native platforms can support. Examples include:
- Auto-generating SEO keywords
- Writing product descriptions from product images
- Analyzing sentiment across sales notes, support tickets, and chat logs
Native tools often cannot access the external data needed or lack the flexibility to adapt the model logic. This is where you will need to invest in building out the model lifecycle architecture layers and integrate with Hugging Face.
A Hybrid Approach: Balancing Speed, Control, and Innovation
The smartest strategy for most organizations is not choosing between native and custom AI, but combining them. A hybrid architecture enables you to leverage native capabilities for speed and scale while extending your stack with Hugging Face for advanced, bespoke intelligence.
Steps to Implement a Hybrid AI Architecture Strategy For Marketing
- Start by defining the architecture building blocks of your AI strategy. As shown above, these would include
- Foundational blocks- Data collection, storage
- Model lifecycle blocks- Model selection, building, evaluation, and deployment
- Implement the foundational blocks in a vendor-neutral manner
- Build multi-source data pipelines and store consolidated data in a shared lakehouse, which can feed both to your Einstein engine or Hugging Face DLCs.
- Govern data centrally across business units (Marketing, Sales, Support, Finance)
- Evaluate native use-case implementations
- For example, Einstein Engagement Scoring works within Salesforce but cannot ingest data from:
- Zendesk, ServiceNow (support)
- Google Analytics, Adobe Analytics (web)
- SAP, NetSuite (billing/contracts)
- Mixpanel, Segment (product usage)
- Sales Cloud and ERP platforms
- If your scoring or personalization needs rely on these data sources, you’ll need to go custom.
- For example, Einstein Engagement Scoring works within Salesforce but cannot ingest data from:
- Catalog and prioritize bespoke AI needs and build the model lifecycle architecture blocks
- Identify use cases not covered by native AI
- Create labeled training datasets and fine-tune models
- Deploy models via APIs and integrate them back into marketing journeys, segmentation logic, or personalization engines
Conclusion: Think Architecture, Not Tooling
Native AI from mar-tech vendors (like Einstein) is powerful but limited for custom, high-value marketing use cases.
Hybrid AI stacks — combining native AI and open-source/custom models (like Hugging Face) — offer a practical, scalable solution.
Key Strategy: Use vendor AI for foundational tasks, extend selectively where differentiation matters.
Architectural Insight: Break down the Marketing AI capability into discrete architecture blocks. Invest in foundational components separately from business-specific projects. Incrementally implement model lifecycle components as part of specific marketing use case implementations.
Business Impact: Hybrid AI unlocks faster innovation, higher ROI, and better cost-sharing across IT and marketing.
Need help creating detailed blueprints for your architecture building blocks? Click here for more details about our offering. You can also find out more about our other AI in marketing related services.
